Discussion about this post

User's avatar
jules's avatar

i love that many people are going back to pen and paper. it feels more natural and honest

Samuel Sanestin's avatar

This is beautifully articulated—and it taps into something deeper than nostalgia. What you’re describing isn’t resistance to progress; it’s a recognition that human cognition and meaning-making were never designed to operate at the pace or volume of modern digital life.

There’s a growing body of work across neuroscience, psychology, and even philosophy that supports what you’re intuitively naming: analogue practices—like handwriting—aren’t just aesthetic preferences, they materially shape how we think. Writing by hand slows cognition to the speed of thought, reinforces memory encoding, and creates a tighter feedback loop between reflection and expression. In contrast, digital environments tend to prioritize speed, output, and fragmentation, often at the expense of depth.

Your framing of having an “analogue brain” is especially compelling because it points to a broader tension: the mismatch between ancient human wiring and modern technological environments. The nervous system you’re describing isn’t deficient—it’s calibrated for attentiveness, embodiment, and synthesis. Those are not outdated traits; they’re increasingly scarce and therefore increasingly valuable.

I’m curious—do you see your analogue practices as a form of personal refuge, or are you intentionally shaping them into a framework for how you engage with the world more broadly?

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?